The Street Runs Red With The Blood Of Banks Again. Citigroup Continues Its Assault On Zero
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/997bf/997bfb26d297d580c3d59892b406c4c47a3f86e1" alt=""
Not long after Eddie Lampert, the massive hedge fund operator, was loading up on Citigroup near its peak price, a few of my friends and I were talking amongst ourselves that Citi could reach $5 a share. (Eddie, I'm available for consultation.) Today the stock plunged right past $5 to close at $4 and change.
Last month Citi received $25 billion from the Treasury. Today, Citi's market capitalization reached that of the government bailout - $25 billion. Do we conclude without the Treasury injection that Citi's market capitalization would be zero? Not directly. But maybe. Citi's market capitalization equaling the dollar amount of the Treasury bailout has a fair amount of irony to it.
We have watched professional prognosticators line up one right after another time and again to take a bullet in the head by recommending or investing in banks. As I've said before, I model bank liquidity and there is nothing I see that points to anything other than more trouble. And, since the last time wrote that last sentence, Citi has dropped another 75%. It appears some learn lessons the hard way. Mostly by losing other people's money.
We have highlighted the 1995 pivot as a *potential bottom* for the S&P and as of today Citi itself has officially reached its 1995 price point. At this point do we have any reason to believe the S&P will not eventually follow?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2565d/2565dd2f53e29e4e869efab95f6224cc37e2019e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45951/459517fc402e22ca5929fc46615945aaf4f59e71" alt=""
<< Home